CHARTER CITY TORONTO
  • The Charter City Proposal
    • Proposal Overview
    • Benefits and Rationale
    • Constitutional Protection
    • Governance and Elections
    • City Authority
    • Resources and Taxation
    • Equity and Inclusion
    • Indigenous Relations
    • GTA ONTARIO CANADA
  • Endorsements
  • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Donate
Picture

A PROJECT TO EMPOWER
​TORONTO AND
LARGE ONTARIO CITIES


SUBSCRIBE TO OUR
NEWSLETTER

City Leaders, Planners Pan Province's New Housing Act

Critics: Act will reduce municipal power, achieve little

Picture
The Doug Ford government has given a new ultimatum to municipalities: approve development plans for condos, apartments and other housing within tight deadlines or face big financial penalties.

It's the Ford government's latest move to reduce municipalities' authority to manage local affairs. 

Critics say it will not only undermine cities' ability to negotiate community benefits and better developments, it will delay new home construction by forcing developers into a cumbersome and already overburdened appeal process.

Instead of working with municipalities to boost their capacity to consider and approve new home construction, the province continues its habit of imposing thoughtless and simplistic demands on local governments.


Read more:

Picture

Ontario’s housing plan will create ‘more red tape': Toronto’s chief planner


Picture

Plan puts more pressure on municipalities: Kingston politicians


Picture

Mike Crawley: What the plan means
for Ontario home prices


Picture

Bid to speed up housing construction may do the opposite: critics

HOW THE PLAN AFFECTS CITIES

• Imposes a deadline on municipalities to approve development site plans within 60 days or refund half of developer fees.

• 100% refund if no decision within 120 days.

• Deadline for zoning amendments: 50 per cent refund of developer fees if amendments not approved within 90 days.

• 100% refund if no decision in 210 days.

• Ignores Housing Task Force recommendations to:

     - Set target of 1.5 million homes built in Ontario over the coming decade and increase density in existing neighbourhoods.



What they're saying:

Picture
.Toronto City Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong (Don Valley East)

• Removing responsibility from local councils leaves community neighbourhoods at the curb

• Shows that neighbourhood decision-making doesn't matter, that building housing
is more important than community input.


Picture
Luisa Sotomayor, York U’s Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change

• The bill undermines local planning autonomy and won’t enhance affordability.

• Toronto has increasingly been left to deal with big issues, where the decisions are made by
federal and provincial authorities and the city’s power to address them is increasingly diminished,
which is a bad trend for democracy.


Picture
Andrew Whittemore, Mississauga Commissioner of Planning and Building

• Reduces time to focus on community consultation, safety and great city-building.

• Transfers risks from developers to municipal taxpayers.

• “The focus is entirely on municipalities with no obligation on developers
to take action to make housing more affordable.”


Picture
City Councillor Josh Matlow (Toronto-St. Paul’s)

• Money-back deadlines are “arbitrary” and “disappointingly immature.”

• Ninety days doesn't take into account that technical issues like sewer capacity, ground water displacement and wind shear must be analyzed by engineers, or that development applications must be sent to other agencies to consider issues such as child care and school capacity, or to coordinate provision of municipal utilities.

Picture
Mary Rita Holland, NDP candidate for Kingston and the Islands

• The Act does not "represent anything that cities have been talking about or asking for."

• "Passing the buck and saying that we need to speed things up and that we're the ones holding things back is not helpful.  I think investing more money into the kind of housing we need--supportive, affordable housing, is the direction that we need to be going in."



Picture
Gregg Lintern, Toronto’s Chief Planner

• “The majority of development in Toronto is approved … because we work with people. That takes some time. It certainly takes more than 60 or 90 days to do it right. Why would we be punished for that? The logic escapes me. It is not the way to do planning.”

• He fears city planners will reject good applications that could have been approved with more time.

• “It will have the unintended consequences of creating more red tape, not less.”



Picture

THE TORONTO
CHARTER CITY PROPOSAL

Picture

EKOS POLL SHOWS MASSIVE
SUPPORT FOR CHARTER CITIES


chartercitytoronto@gmail.com
    JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
    Enter your name, e-mail address
    ​ and postal code.
    We'll send our e-mail updates to your inbox.   
    ​You can unsubscribe at any time.

    [Object]
    This just helps us to understand where in Toronto our subscribers live so we can see where we are reaching.
Submit
Picture
​LOGO DESIGN / Julien Balbontin
ABOUT US

The goal of Charter City Toronto is the adoption of a constitutionally protected City Charter for Toronto and other large Ontario municipalities who want one.

A Charter would assign greater autonomy, new sources of revenue and protection from undue provincial interference in local affairs.

We're a group of independent residents of Toronto who believe cities are the most important level of government in our confederation, and that they should be accorded the respect, authority, resources and protection necessary for them to fulfill their responsibilities.

 
More About Us
  • The Charter City Proposal
    • Proposal Overview
    • Benefits and Rationale
    • Constitutional Protection
    • Governance and Elections
    • City Authority
    • Resources and Taxation
    • Equity and Inclusion
    • Indigenous Relations
    • GTA ONTARIO CANADA
  • Endorsements
  • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Donate